Crassus
6:12 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Thanks mate
|
isca hammer
6:07 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
http://cricfree.live/watchfeeds/demand/3
working for me mate
|
Crassus
6:04 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Morning
Anyone have a stream for this?
|
nerd
5:37 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
He is a knob , this is being dragged out . The last knockout was an hour ago.
|
isca hammer
5:24 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
I can`t take David Haye seriously, i wish he would shut the fuck up.
|
nerd
4:19 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Another knockout , is there many fights left on the undercard.
|
nerd
4:00 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Got it on at work, 6m x 4m screen ,not too bad and i'm the boss. Undercard has been good so far .
|
Gavros
1:57 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
One to catch up on after the event for me.
|
Lee Trundle
12:59 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
4am supposedly.
|
Joe C
12:56 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
What time’s it due to start?
|
Hermit Road
12:14 Sun Sep 16
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Yep.
|
collyrob
11:32 Sat Sep 15
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Looking forward to this tonight. Anyone staying up for it?
|
longford
7:54 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
yeah, i only know as i keep an active eye out for such things, but yeah pretty much mate.
it aint even got a broadcast deal..
its ppv via ..........wait for it ...... you tube !!
|
gank
5:09 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Ferdinand will beat them both.
|
East Auckland Hammer
2:19 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Yeah I think so too.
Be great if he could put in a decent performance too.
I understand the promotion of the fight has been pretty much non-existent over there?
|
longford
1:46 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
cool...
parker wins for me
|
longford
12:07 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
are you an ex pat mate ?
|
East Auckland Hammer
12:03 Tue Sep 19
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Yeah Lane was the man.
The whole thing is a shambles ever since Fury had a "back injury" and had to pull out of the original fight 6 months ago. Well, longer actually since he somehow manged to become the mandatory challenger despite having absolutely no claim to the position.
He'd have had a neutral ref and 3 neutral judges if he'd fought down here.
Probably why he didn't want to.
|
longford
11:57 Mon Sep 18
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
Mils lane was my favorite ref .....
i dont think theres much to worry about in bias with an English referee , different story with judges tho , promoters should not be able to pick judges for their own fights
|
East Auckland Hammer
11:49 Mon Sep 18
Re: GGG V Canelo Alverez
|
You'd think that a neutral ref would just be a given really, wouldn't you?
For a world heavyweight title fight, even if it's the shit belt.
Just about everybody involved in the fight has said they want a neutral ref, although I wouldn't trust the Fury's as far as I could throw them.
|
| 
